Wandering the savage garden…

A Letter to a Church I Left

This is a letter I wrote to myself, to process my feelings and my sense of grief and loss after choosing to stop attending a church that I respect and, honestly, that I like. I just couldn’t keep going. This was not sent, because I couldn’t see how to make sure it would be received positively; it’d be very easy to take this as scathing criticism, and that’s not what it is. I am publishing it just in case anyone else wonders if they feel the same things – and to suggest that they shouldn’t have to.

Pastor, I wanted to reach out, sort of, to just clear the air in my own mind.

If you haven’t guessed, and you have, we’re no longer attending the church. It’s fine; there’re some residual mild scars on our part (the reason we left, because we don’t do things without cause), but there’s no bitterness, and we haven’t run down you, or the church, or the Church as a whole. We just felt like we were failed in some important ways, and I wanted to write you about why.

And yes, I know, you’re unlikely to read this. I wrote this to myself, so I could work through all of it and just process it. If you do read this, rest assured, I expect it to be for information’s sake only. It really is a record of myself for myself, and if you read this I hope it might be useful to you or others somehow, and if you are reading this, I mean it for your benefit and mine.

Did you know my mother had died, or when? Why, or why not?

I get it, if you didn’t: I don’t talk to people easily or well. She died in the summer, I found out Friday morning, and played for the worship team that Sunday.

My relationship with my mother was interesting; she was a real human being, with everything that implies, faults and flaws and wonders and achievements, all together. She was able to hold immense faith in one hand and offer you betrayal and suspicion in the other, and I say that not to impugn her memory but to recognize who she was and why our relationship was fraught.

And I grieve oddly: not only am I an introvert, but I’ve seen a lot of death for most of my life. I grew up in a high risk situation, in an age of much more primitive medicine. I’ve experienced enough of the mortal coil that a passing doesn’t bother me much. It can’t. I’ve seen too much of it.

But with my mother, it’s not just the ending of her life: it’s the ending without real resolution. There can be no peace made with the dead; all peace is from stasis, and that’s where my mother and I were left. She was dead. I was not. We had not come to a point where we were satisfied, and she suffered from dementia that prevented most such clarification; I suppose there was the possibility that she’d come into her own mind and we could come to an understanding, but her passing ended that.

Such is life. Yet I am also human, and this was my mother, and I grieved in my own way… isolated, alone, in the middle of the church.

I remember. I remember “How are you doing, man?” – and the pro forma response was, and is, “Fine,” because that’s the Man Code. I was not fine. I was trying to figure out how to rebalance my world, isolated, alone, in the middle of the church. My wife had suggested I not go, but I had made a commitment, and I take commitments seriously, so we went. (Plus, what else was I going to do?)

Did you know she’d died? Did anyone? Who was I supposed to have connected to at the church such that someone, anyone, would have known? You? The worship pastor? Anyone? If not the two of you – the two people with whom I personally had the strongest connections in the church – then who? When?

Was I supposed to go to you and bare my soul? How? Because I understand that I am not necessarily like most people; most people would hear “my mother passed away” and think of the grief as a simple loss. One loves and honors one’s parents, so that’s simple enough, stiff upper lip, we’re sorry for your loss, and that’s that.

I get that. Yet that is not me. That is not my loss.

And there’s the problem, right there: I don’t think anyone at our church ever invested in us, in my family. There was some investment: I do not mean to deny everything, because I can’t in any honest way. Yet it felt like there was a sort of quid pro quo involved: if we extended effort to a specific degree, we might eventually expect a return investment to a similar degree; as we plugged in, so would we be plugged in and eventually the clique would see us as more than interlopers, as more than names and faces.

The thing is: we don’t have it to give. I hold myself apart because the maelstrom of my inner and outer lives is not your effin’ problem… but it’s an effin’ church. The Body has to concern itself with the hand, even though the hand is not the Body. And I make no demands – like I said, there is no demand here, no intended recrimination – but there were failures: we failed to signify who we were, and we were failed in that people took that as how it was, that’s fine, even in moments when I feel like it should have been obvious that it was not good enough to be fine.

You’ve asked me for insight in various ways; I appreciate that, even while I find it amusing. (Who am I to have insight? Is it worth it?) Yet when asked, I offered; you asked about deep emotions, and for the love of God and out of my own depths, I answered in my own way. And it was worth it, I hope.

And I was tentative in other ways, I know, but I still tried, to respect what people could bear while respecting myself and the people who could bear more. I know I am not simple, and I know others are, and I cannot disrespect that, and I do not disrespect that. But I tried.

And yet, if you asked me if I felt seen or known at the church, I’d say no. I do not have any idea how anyone there would have described me, were they asked, even you. I’d be a name, probably a face – I know my face is pretty memorable. Some might be able to describe something of my faith. But if anyone asked what I did, or what my hopes were, or what my fears were, or what my struggles were, or when I lost my job… who would have known? Who would have cared?

Being perfectly frank, I think the caring ended at the Man Code: pro forma, we go around the room, we ask, we move on as we hope nobody really digs in the dirt of their own lives for others to see. That’s how I felt.

Why? Why was I asking the various Toms, Dicks, and Harrys about the concerns they had in their lives, but … that was the end of the exchange? I know it feels like I’m being selfish for me to say “What about us? We cared for others, what about us, us? US?” But the fact remains: a well that is never supplied runs dry.

And we ran dry.

I don’t have any answers, because I don’t have a question. I only see data, and patterns. And this was a pattern that cost my family, it cost us in time and endurance and forbearance for little slights, surely unintended but easily avoided with any understanding – and that understanding was lacking.

And there was no reason for it to be lacking. We were doing the best that we could to establish every connection we were able to make, and it was not enough. That’s not on you or the church – it’s a holistic problem, and we’re part of it… yet were I to look purely analytically, I’d say that something was missed that shouldn’t have been.

I don’t blame you, or anyone else there – in fact, I have no desire or even ability to point fingers. We all carry our own heavy burdens, and my family is not your specific concern, or anyone else’s. But I’d say that if there was a problem to observe at a systemic level, it’s this: we should have been someone’s burden, even as little as we were able to invest in creating those connections.

Maybe not yours – but someone’s. And we weren’t, and it was painfully clear, and that was untenable for us: attendance in a vacuum did more to weaken our walk than it did to encourage us, and that’s not a situation that I could put my family through.

Some Recent Events

I know, it’s been a year since I’ve posted. This blog has been effectively unmaintained. And it’s been a year!

Trump got elected, after having been shot at by mostly peaceful opponents. He apparently survived.

Charlie Kirk, a conservative firebrand, also got shot at. And killed. I surprised myself by watching his memorial, which was attended by a lot of conservative politicians and a few preachers.

It was a good memorial, as thing go. I was moved by many of the speakers; they offered straight up testimony for Christ in many cases, actually really well done; Erika Kirk, Charlie’s widow, gave by far the best speech in Charlie’s memory, and was one of the most effective speakers overall.

She was followed by Trump, who echoed many of the Christian sentiments – which surprised me, because they were actually pretty earnest and theologically compliant if not exactly complex or deep – and included many of his own political purposes. I actually thought Trump and Tucker Carlson – who seemed unhinged – were the least effective speakers at the memorial, although I respect Trump’s honesty in saying that he admired Ms. Kirk’s willingness to seek forgiveness for her husband’s murder – followed by him saying bluntly that he resented his enemies and would not forgive them.

It’s an interesting observation, really. As the Chief Executive, his purpose is to pursue justice – which means that justice for murderers and the like should be applied, not mercy. Yet in my opinion, that should be his role as President and applied properly, but his personal position should be to extend grace where possible.

Ms. Kirk was a far better witness and inspiration than Trump.

This should surprise nobody.

As usual, it’s been too long.

And lots of things have happened, and I’ve been watching, from this blog’s perspective – I’ve actually been pretty busy, but not *here*, and I feel kinda bad about that.

Music and Performance in Worship

I’ve been a member of a number of worship bands. I think none of them have been successful engagements for me, to varying degrees, and it’s taken me a while to really work out why.

I thought for a long time that it’s about my ability to really commit to the bands, to be part of them on a weekly basis, and I still think this is a lot of it. When I couldn’t say “Yes, I’ll be there” every week, I ended up being a guest musician, a stand-in, and that really doesn’t help a band gel.

Of course, the next question is: is gelling necessary? To some degree, yes: the band has to trust its component members. The guitarist doesn’t need to be wondering if the bass player’s going to be hitting the note, or when, and inconsistent membership creates an opportunity for, well, a lack of trust.

But I think the biggest problem is still me, not my attendance or consistency. It’s a differentiation in how worship music is played, what it is, why it is, and how I see worship in music. It’s a juxtaposition that I don’t think is innately reconcilable in the context of most churches – maybe all churches, really.

The culture of the church would have to change in order to create a music ministry to which I could meaningfully contribute.


Worship music is, by and large, a cover band’s domain. You’re playing someone else’s songs – Hillsong’s, or Shane and Shane’s, or Phil Wickham’s, for example – and generally you’re trying to play them in a way that’s representative of what the congregation is expecting to hear, so they can participate in worship. You’re leading worship, after all.

What’s more, those musicians – for whom I hold a lot of respect, honestly – design their songs for that environment. They’re not pushing the limits very often. They’ll introduce a key change here and there for emotive reasons (“This is the section that’s resolving all the energy we’ve built up, so we’re going from G to A!”) or occasionally a grace note or chord so that the song stands out from a musical perspective. (Shane and Shane are really good at this.)

The result is that most worship music of a given era sounds… very similar. Derivative, really. There’s nothing wrong with this, because familiarity helps the congregation participate in worship.

I have a hard time connecting with this. I’ve tried writing Christian worship songs, and it sounds very much like what it actually is: an artist trying to write something that sounds like something else. Not only do I find most Christian worship music derivative and repetitive, but my own Christian worship music is derivative and repetitive, except moreso.

I despise my attempts in this area. I recognize experience is a factor there, but I feel that it’s dead in its origin, and I don’t think there’s a spark there to light into flame.

When I play worship music, I feel like it’s important for me to not only lead the congregation in worship – which is the main point of the worship band, after all – but to worship as well. If I’m not participating in the act of worship, I’m not even a conduit – I’m a puppet, miming notes for others to follow.

So when I play, i find myself fighting the desire to play to the utmost of my ability: not to flash, necessarily (I’m not an especially flashy player) but to feel to motion of the music, to amplify it, to play it as well as I am able to according to what I feel the music desires.

I want to play it as if I were playing it before the Holy One. It’s not just miming notes for others to follow, but for me to play.

So the result is that I play… harder, perhaps (not in a “ROCK ON!!!!!” sense, but more intensely) than most of my bandmates, and I have to work intently on playing less than I feel I can and should, in order to fit in and to fulfill the limited goals of a worship band: I play down to the audience, as opposed to up to The Lord.

I don’t resent this. I understand the goals of a worship band, and I also understand that my skills and approach may not be the same as the skills and approaches of the other band members.

But it means that for me, playing in the worship band is a slog, and an unfulfilling one, and I keep thinking that leaks into the performance as well. Because I don’t feel fulfilled in playing worship music in a church, I am unable to serve the congregation in the manner I intend.

To me, music in church should be as it was for David, leaping and dancing before the Ark: the Bible records his wife Michal scolding him for his unrestrained joy (2 Sam 6:16-23). I get Michal’s point – but I feel like I imagine David did, with Michal saying “Show some restraint, be respectable before your fellow man,” when David’s desire was to show his commitment to God and his joy at a victory God had granted him.

So what’s the conclusion here? I think that I’m willing to play to help a band, but I think they’re not especially well-served by this, nor am I. I think my long-term goal is to play the music God has planted in my heart for those who wish to hear it – which may mean just the Lord and me, and I’m fine with that – and let worship bands do what they do better than I do.