• About me
  • Bible Translations

Exploring the Well

Wandering the savage garden...

“We just want the war to end…”

Posted on November 3, 2023 Written by savage Leave a Comment

Well, if you’re saying that, or reading someone who says that, good. Know that I’m right there with you – or them. I want the war in Gaza to end, today. Same for the war in Ukraine. Same for any war, anywhere.

All it would take for the war in Gaza to end is for Hamas to concede, and wage war no more. If they reached out, through whatever emissary is available – and there are lots of them – and said. “no more war, we are stopping, no more rockets, no more dead Israelis,” then they’d have:

  • A nation-state, as they’ve had since 2005 (given that Israel withdrew willingly and has shown no real desire to go back)
  • No more dead children in refugee camps, as Hamas keeps storing weapons and military leaders in those places, which is:
    • A war crime
    • Converting those places into military targets with military value, and targeting them is not a war crime
  • Everything they want except lots more dead Jews

Blaming Israel for continuing a war in which the aggressors have not stopped waging war themselves is ridiculous and, really, rather evil. Stop it, people.

It’s worth observing, although it’s not original with me: if Gaza laid down its weapons, you’d have peace between Israel and Gaza. If Israel laid down its weapons, you’d have a lot of dead Israelis. Do the math, when you screech that you just want peace in the region. And this isn’t random supposition – this is based on Hamas’ own expressions on Al Jazeera and other such mediums.

The purpose of war is to get the opposing government (Hamas, in Israel’s case) to concede. There is no other end point unless you want Israel to suffer more. So if you’re going “b-b-b-b-but Israel shouldn’t keep shooting,” you’re trying to encourage the deaths of more Jews, in the short term – as that’s the goal Hamas isn’t giving up on – and more Gazans, in the long term, since the way Hamas gets more dead Jews is through having more dead Gazans. (And you know it, too, since Hamas keeps reiterating that last point, explicitly, over and over and over again… and you just don’t care, and don’t listen, because you’d rather have more dead Jews?)

Filed Under: General Tagged With: gaza, israel, war

All of those dead children…

Posted on November 3, 2023 Written by savage Leave a Comment

Caitlin Johnstone posted on Twitter (or X, or whatever you want to call it), this fine post:

No matter how much you talk about October 7, it will still be a fact that Israel is raining military explosives upon an enclosed area full of children, and that it urgently needs to stop.

No matter how much you talk about how evil and bad Hamas are, it will still be a fact that Israel is raining military explosives upon an enclosed area full of children, and that it urgently needs to stop.

No matter how much you say the words “human shields”, it will still be a fact that Israel is raining military explosives upon an enclosed area full of children, and that it urgently needs to stop.

No matter how much you accuse Israel’s critics of loving terrorists, it will still be a fact that Israel is raining military explosives upon an enclosed area full of children, and that it urgently needs to stop.

No matter how much you accuse Israel’s critics of hating Jews, it will still be a fact that Israel is raining military explosives upon an enclosed area full of children, and that it urgently needs to stop.

No matter how many words you use or how much narrative spin you try to put on it or how many ad hominems you throw at the people criticizing what Israel is doing, it will still be a fact that Israel is raining military explosives upon an enclosed area full of children, and that it urgently needs to stop.

In essence, I agree… but Ms. Johnstone seems to blame Israel.

I get it.

The idea of dead children is horrifying. That’s exactly why Hamas creates them.

Ms. Johnstone blames Israel for falling into a trap of Hamas’ explicit making. Hamas herds children into military targets, Israel hits those targets, Hamas gets to say “but they killed the human shields we put there!” and fine, fine people like Ms. Johnstone blame Israel instead of, you know, the actual war criminals (as using human shields, especially deliberately, is a war crime, and Hamas isn’t even shy about it, having bragged about this strategy publicly.)

I don’t want any dead children, whether in Gaza or Israel. Ms. Johnstone seems to have forgotten the Israeli children butchered by Gaza by explicit targeting, in her fury at blaming Israel for conducting a war against legitimate military targets with civilian casualties.

But if Hamas had any agreement with her, in trying to avoid dead children, they could have.. you know… not targeted children on October 7 themselves (they did) or even not herd children into military encampments (they do) or, here’s an idea, not use places where children are, like refugee camps, for military purposes (again, a war crime, but one they commit so often that it’s difficult to observe without sounding like a broken record.)

Filed Under: General Tagged With: children, gaza, hamas, israel, refugees, war

Israel and Gaza after Oct 7, 2023

Posted on November 3, 2023 Written by savage Leave a Comment

I’ve been trying to think about what to say about the war between Israel and Gaza for nearly a month, and I’ve come up empty. But I think I have something, at last.

Before I go any further, let me summarize it: on October 7, 2023, Hamas – the governing party of Gaza – sent a number of militants over the border into Israel, and they killed 1400 Israelis (including both Jews and Arabs), filming horrific acts of the murder of entire families (parents, grandparents, children, babies) and rape, including desecration of the dead, and active celebration of the slaughter.

It constitutes a large number of war crimes, at nearly all levels, and most certainly constitutes a cassus belli, a phrase that means “a legitimate cause for war.” Israel then declared war on Gaza, and bombed a number of military sites in Gaza (including places Gaza claims are not military sites, like schools and homes, despite using those sites for military purposes, which is itself a war crime.)

It hurts to read all of it. I don’t want people to be at war. I don’t want anyone celebrating the deaths of others, including those who actively call for my death.

And I haven’t really been able to coalesce a coherent set of thoughts about any of it, but I finally started making some progress a couple of days ago.

It started with reading something someone posted to defend Gaza, I think: it was that “hurt people hurt people,” meaning that Gaza’s actions were sourced in Gaza’s people’s collective trauma.

I understand that on a few levels. Not many, though, because their trauma is largely self-inflicted, and blaming Israel seems like a convenient excuse more than anything else; according to Hamas’ charter, articles 7 and 13, Hamas wants nothing less than the genocide of all Jews (article 7) and the destruction of Israel as a state (article 13).

There’s no compromise they’re willing to make when it comes to genocide of Jews or destruction of Israel, so it feels a little silly to even try – yet Israel has tried. In 2005, Israel withdrew, completely, from Gaza and the West Bank. Gaza is self-determining. Gaza “buys” medicine, food, water, and power from Israel – yet Israel doesn’t collect what it should on that, as part of an acceptable loss for the purpose of a peace that has never been realized, as Hamas keeps launching rockets indiscriminately at Israel.

Indiscriminate targeting is a war crime: targeting military emplacements is not, but Hamas doesn’t care; as its goal is total destruction of every Jew, they just shrug and say, “For our purposes it’s all military, we guess,” and the world nods wisely and agrees for some stupid reason. You might say it’s hatred of Jews, but… just because it seems targeted at Jews and the only country that actively harbors them, well, that seems a little pointed, no?

The thing that struck me about “hurt people hurt people,” though, is that it’s… not one-way. There’s a reason Israel exists, after all: it’s the literal harbor state for Jews. It’s the only harbor state for my people. Israel was created when Jews finally recognized that there was no assimilation complete enough such that we Jews would be allowed to survive as equals among Gentile nations.

Was the creation of Israel burdened with pain? You bet. There’s a long set of stories associated with the creation of Israel. I do not believe there is a purity, or innocence, in that creation. For multiple reasons, there was a displacement, although it was nowhere near as total as the PLO would have you believe; there was no Palestinian national identity, and what we know as the Palestinians today was formed largely as a way to resist Israel’s mere existence.

That existence was due to “hurt people” – the Jews, largely of Europe and Western Asia – hurting, coming off of a pogrom that killed upwards of six million, who had nowhere else to go. So they chose their ancestral homeland, what with every other option being discarded (Australia and Madagascar were requested and rejected). If the Jewish option was living among their murderers and those who accepted murder of Jews… they chose to go “home.”

And were attacked for it. If you look at the wars Israel has been engaged in since its creation, every one since that creation has been instigated by the Arab countries surrounding it. Israel has still survived.

Many of those wars were in defiance of ceasefires and treaties between Israel and it attackers. Israel has still survived.

Israel’s gone above and beyond, in my opinion, to pursue peace and, often, preserve the same people who howl for Jewish blood. When Israel took the Sinai from Egypt – thanks to a victory in war, the typical way such land is acquired – they gave it back for the purpose of peace. They accepted a two-state solution with the West Bank and Gaza … for the purpose of peace, and left both territories, only to have both the West Bank and Gaza reignite tensions, although not quite as horrifically as we saw in October of 2023.

As I’ve said, I don’t think there’s “innocence” in the conflict. The initial comment that got me thinking was that “hurt people hurt people,” and it was meant to excuse Hamas’ incursion (“Hey, Gaza doesn’t like being isolated by Israel just because they howl for Israeli blood every day, you know!”) and it struck me how essentially unbalanced that sentiment was:

After all, Israel was created from two thousand years of my peoples’ agony, and that, too, creates a burden.

I pray constantly that the people in the region could decide that loving their children was more important than the deaths of their enemies. I pray also that their leaders could pursue peace earnestly – when you look at Israel’s current leaders, you see that they benefit from the conflict, and I hate that. And there’re many matrices of responses to observations about the conflict that have both justifications and completely rational rebuttals.

But at no point can I condone anything Hamas did in any of this, even if I find myself somewhat able to understand the rationale. The application is evil, and there can be no peace until Hamas is no longer effective and no longer indoctrinating Palestinians.

We’ll only have peace after Jesus comes, or after Arab and Jew can see each other as humans, and not parasites, a situation Israel was trying to create back in September when it granted ten thousand work permits to Gazans (which have since been cancelled, given the rapacious attack by Gazans on Israeli citizens at Hamas’ request.)

Filed Under: General Tagged With: gaza, israel, war

Man, Gideon didn’t end well

Posted on April 17, 2014 Written by savage Leave a Comment

In my Bible-in-a-year quest, I’m still way behind, but at least I’m in Judges now. I just got done reading about Gideon, and it’s pretty sad; it doesn’t end well.

To really see the whole, I needed to step back and consider the whole narrative. (And, of course, I still could be missing quite a bit.)

First off, this is Israel in the time of the tribal league. D’vorah is no longer a judge. Israel has yet again turned from God. (This is a recurring thing with Israel, just as it is with us.)

Because of the terms of the Covenant, God has invoked the curses; Midian is oppressing Israel. The text – in Judges 6:1-6 – doesn’t make it sound quite like a military invasion. It sounds like the Midianim are simply moving in, overwhelming the Israelites through numbers; they “devoured the produce of the land” and left nothing for Israel; as a result, the tribes fled to the mountains.

This is, of course, an inverse of what Israel itself did to the Kenanim: a foreign, numerous host comes in like a plague of locusts. Is there a difference? Well, it depends on whose perspective you use.

For the Kenanim, well, Israel was a foreign invader; numerous, hungry, convinced, the invader was victorious, and aggressive about asserting cultural purity. The Canaanites fought back militarily as well as subversively; the Gibeonites, for example, lied to the Israelites to convince them that there was not a cultural conflict, with the result that the Gibeonites were a local cultural influence – and for Israel, a foreign culture, with foreign idols, was a bad thing.

From the Israelite perspective, the culture war was necessary; a pure culture, arranged around the Covenant, was a mandate. Any violation of this was an offense, and here we see part of the result of the failure to assert a monoculture.

The Midianites were a foreign culture, invading the Israelite culture. The result is conflict.

Anyway: Gideon. Israel has violated the monoculture, God has allowed the Midianites to move in on Israel. As we’ve seen before in Hebrew history, God raises a messiah – Gideon – to rescue Israel.

God called Gideon from his father’s land as he worked a winepress (according to Judges 6:11-12). Gideon is struggling with doubt; if God saved Israel, why has Midian attacked and been successful? Why has God not delivered Israel already?

The messenger of God then tells Gideon that he is the one who will deliver Israel; Gideon, echoing Moshe, says that he is unable to do it, that he’s the least of his father’s house. He demands signs and proof; he receives them.

I’m not quite sure how well this plays with D’varim 6:16, which says “You shall not put the Lord your God to the test.” I suppose it doesn’t matter; in the end, Gideon agrees.

The next part of the story is fairly well-known (or it was to me, at least) – Gideon goes to war with the Midianites, using a small force of 300 men; armed with trumpets and torches, they frightened the army of the Midianites into fleeing.

Wait, when were the brothers killed at Tabor? The text doesn’t say. Gideon’s just ticked about it, as I suppose he should be.. but the text of Judges refers to the deaths at Tabor only in the past tense.

Pursuing the army (in part for revenge for killing his brothers at Mount Tabor), they asked for help from Succot and Penuel, being denied in both cases (Judges 8:4-9) – a move that both Succot and Penuel would regret, after Gideon was victorious.

His denial of the kingship is a little ironic – we’ll see why, when we get to Judges 9.

Speaking of his total victory – avenging his brothers, conquering the Midianites – Gideon takes their treasure and screws up. After denying the tribal league’s desire to make him a king, he makes a breastplate, an ephod; it becomes a “snare to Israel,” according to Judges 8:27.

The irony of the kingship comes home: Gideon (known now as Jerub-Baal, “contends with Baal,” although it could also mean “one who defends the Name” or “one who strives with the Name”) has many sons, one of whom is named Abimelech, which means “son of the king.” (Melech is “king” in Hebrew.)

But Gideon’s not a king! Whoops. This doesn’t look good, and it will continue to not look good.

Abimelech then declares himself a king in Shechem, a city in the middle of Israel, killing his own brothers – save one, Jotham, the youngest. Jotham makes an impassioned speech against Abimelech to Shechem – the people who declared Abimelech king – and in three years’ time, we see a war between the supporters of Jotham (who is not a claimant to a throne) and Abimelech, with the result that Abimelech chases his opponents to a tower, where a woman throws a stone and wounds him.

This highlights the position of D’vorah as judge – as a woman, she was seen as surely not being deserving of being a ruler. But she was. Women for the win, I suppose.

Abimelech then commands a soldier to kill him, so that it could not be said that he died at the hand of a woman. The text in Judges 9:57 states that Shechem ended up losing as well: the evil of the men of Shechem “returned on their heads,” as a result of declaring Abimelech as king in the first place.

And Jotham fades from history.

Thus ends the first recorded kingship in Israel.

Filed Under: Bible Study, General Tagged With: abimelech, gideon, israel, jotham

Tags

500words action apologetics art assyria behavior church cnn covenant ethics exegesis faith forgiveness gaza grind history homosexuality homosexuals inspiration israel jesus jonah law love music nehemiah paul persistence philippians power prayer pride proverbs reason redemption romans samuel self-control selfishness shema sin trump truth war writing

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · Focus Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in